Consider this an attempt to remake my old Tèrnaru language from scratch.
The language is primarily isolating, and has a SOV typology, though it displays remnants of an ancestor language with VSO typology, particularly in the initial complex, which is a fossilised auxiliary verb. Its morphosyntactic alignment resembles that found in Austronesian alignment, but also resembles that of fluid-S languages.
The transcription method used in this document is not the language’s native orthography and is only a latinisation for convenience.
The phonology of the language is relatively simple.
There are nine vowels. The schwa only occurs in unstressed syllables.
i u e ə o ɛ ɔ a ɑ
Orthographically, these are realised as:
i u e y o è ò a á
‘y’ might appear to be an odd choice to represent schwa, but I’m Irish and I’m familiar with Welsh and Manx, so it’s not odd to me. The choice of the grave accent for lowering and thus ‘è’ and ‘ò’ to represent /ɛ/ and /ɔ/ is based on Romance languages. My choice of ‘á’ to represent /ɑ/ is based loosely Irish and the fact that I needed some reasonable choice to represent the sound and recycling the grave accent didn’t seem appropriate. Other possibilities would’ve been to use the trema or the circumflex, but both would’ve had their own issues.
The consonant system is similarly simple:
Bil Alv Ret Vel U V U V V U V Stop p b t d k g Fricative f v s z Nasal m n Flap r Lat. App. l
/f/ can be realised as either [f] or [ɸ] and /v/ as [v] or [β]. They’re generally realised bilabially. /s/ can be realised [ʃ] or [s] and /z/ and be realised as [ʒ] or [z]. Both are generally realised as alveolar consonants. [h] is occasionally used to prevent hiatus, but is not written.
Some sample sentences
? fè ták ? βe tɑk MID.PST 1sg hit 'I hit myself'
A Note Before You Continue
This is the language sketched circa January 2001. At the time of writing, that makes this three and a half years out of date. It’s not that stuff has changed, just that this leaves a lot of the language’s details out.
It’s about time I put this thing up here though: I should have done this a long time ago.
The various phrases of the sentence can roam freely and have no set position asides from the trend of the subject/topic being the first item in the sentence and the verb complex being last, making it an SOV language.
There is a growing tendancy towards making sentences VSO. If so, the Verbal Particle sits after the verb, otherwise it tends to come before the verb. Relative clauses are always SOV.
The verb in Térnaru is generally the last item in the sentence. It is accompanied by a particle called the Verbal Particle (VP). The verb itself takes very few inflections, except for clause nominalisation in the creation of relative clauses, deriving the gerund and verbal adjective, and in deriving the imperative forms of the verb.
Where the sentence is topicalised, the VP or any other element may come between the verb and the case particles of the topicalised NP, e.g.
“As for me, I was happy”:
(1) Vé íl a-gílt 1SG PST EXP-be.happy *(2) Vé al-íl gílt 1SG EXP-PST be.happy
(1) is a well-formed sentence; (2) is not. This is because the particle a, which marks the Absolutive case is seperated from the verb gílt (be happy) by the VP—íl—marking the sentence as being in the past tense.
Inflections upon verbs are usually for the purpose of derivation—creating a wholly new verb, noun, or adjectiv—except in the case of the nominalising suffix -un, used in forming relative clauses, and the suffix -ya to make verb imperative (th only mood not indicated on the VP).
The singular imperative is indicated with the suffix -iés. The plural imperative is indicated with the suffix -nu which causes a complex degree of mutation on the preceeding consonants. I’ll outline this when I have time.
The gerund is formed with the suffix -dwé; the verbal adjective from the gerund + -in, e.g.
dyoren > dyorendé > dyorendwin fall falling fallen
The agent noun is formed with the prefix il- and affects the voicing of the following consonant by making it unvoiced, e.g.
tak > iltak hit hitter (one who hits)
The patient noun is similarly formed to the agent noun with the prefix in- and affects the voicing of the following consonant by making it voiced, e.g.
tak > indak hit hitee (one who is hit)
The VP may be placed virtually anywhere in the sentence, so long as it doesn’t split any NPs or seperate a topic’s case particles from the verb.
The form of the VP is:
where Ø indicates the null morpheme acting as the root to which all other affixes are attached.
The only currently known type-P prefix is s-. This indicates the sentence is interrogative.
Type-1 suffixes indicate tense and are -íl (Past), -(e) (Present, the e is epethentic), -en (Future), and -at (Abstract).
Type-2 suffixes indicate mood and are -né (Ability), -wa (Need), -ié (Intent), -an (Appropriateness/Trueness), -té (Subjunctive: doubt/assumption) and, -ur (Optative: wish). Note though that -en + -né = -enté and -at + -té = -asé.
Noun Phrases (NPs)
Each NP except the topic has a Case Particle (CP), or preposition if you prefer, to denote their purpose in relation to the rest of the sentence. This particle comes before its NP. An NP may have more than one particle in front of it if it serves more than one purpose in the sentence, e.g. if the sentence is reflexive, a sentence such as
(3) an-a-Lídu íl ták ACT-PAT-Lídu PST hit "Lídu hit himself" (assuming Lídu is male)
is perfectly valid.
Other than that, adjectives follow the nouns they govern; direct and indirect relative clauses follow the NPs the govern too; numbers preceed the noun, between the CP and the noun.
Pluralisation is indicated with the suffix -í. Between the noun and the pluralisation suffix come the determiners.
Nouns are by default indefinite. When affixing a determiner, in some cases the epethentic vowel e is introduced. In other cases it’s not, with the determiner causing some sort of mutation in the preceeding letters.
The determiners are -d- (Definite/Demonstrative: this/these), -r- (Definite/Demonstrative: that/those), and -w- (Partitive).
Where -d- occurs after a liquid, rhotic, glide or vowel, no change occurs. When it occurs after a nasal consonant, that nasa consonant becomes n. If it occurs after t or d, it becomes s, e.g. érakwant > érakwans, érakwansí. Otherwise the epethentic vowel e is inserted.
Where -w- follows a w, it becomes l, e.g. éw > élwí. In the singular, if -w- is not preceeded by a vowel, a is added at the end, e.g. éw > élwí.
Following an r, -r- becomes -l-, e.g. alvír > alvírla, alvírí.
The posessives are affixed after the plural affix, if any. They are:
The pronouns are:
Here’s an incomplete list of the case markers. The letter given in brackets is now epethentic, but was once part of particle and only now appears to prevent hiatus.
The relational marker means from, of, related to, associated with, etc…
In intransitive sentences, the Actor marker is used to mark an active subject, i.e. one who willingly/voluntarily takes part (‘I slid across the ice’—I made myself slide on it), whereas the Experiencer marker is used to mark an passive subject, i.e. one who does not take part of their own will (‘I was slid across the ice’—Someone else made me slide on it).
Relative Clauses are essentially nominalised sentences. They are always topicalised, with the topic at the beginning—being the NP governed by the clause—and ending with a nominalised verb. This is similar to the way Japanese relative clauses work.
(4) Tagas a-Lídu íl al-abrírun information ACT-Lídu PST PAT-desire-NMLS "The information that Lidu wanted"
I have this described, but I don’t want to post it yet.
The four particles representing the degrees most (superlative), more (comparative), less (negative comparative), and least (negative superlative) are néa, nus, séa, and sun respectively. They follow their adjectives, e.g. gí (happy) and gí néa (happiest).
Thoughs and Stuff
I’ve been thinking that I might make it a common idiom in the language that stuff like adjectives of colour would be simply nouns in the genitive case. But what about the comparitives? Hmmm…
Similarly, I’ve been thinking of using the genitive plural with counted nouns, e.g. five apples = five of apples, or something similar. That seems pretty neat, and it’s make the language looks somewhat cleaner to boot.